Профиль

How many settled cases would you like to see?

The cope is reaching escape velocity. “There is no such thing as ‘reverse discrimination’” — except the EEOC itself says the exact opposite: “ALL race or sex discrimination is equally unlawful.” That’s their official position while suing companies over it.

Your blanket “never” claim is the kind of rhetoric that collapses under one court filing. White people (and Asians) have won reverse discrimination cases for decades because civil rights law bans racial discrimination — all of it. Title VII doesn’t have a “but only against minorities” clause.

So DEI programs don’t exist? Federal contractors, university admissions, corporate hiring, government grants, and medical residencies use racial preferences that explicitly disadvantage Whites and Asians. Stop pretending the remedy for past race-consciousness is more race-consciousness.

Your version keeps us stuck in the nightmare, not the dream. The Revolution was a rejection of group-based favoritism by birth, not a blueprint for it by skin. Why can’t you see that?

That’s not a rebuttal; it’s a perpetual motion machine for racial division.

The circular reasoning is Olympic-level. “We aren’t at a point where society functions that way” — meaning we must keep using race as the central organizing principle until racism magically disappears… by using more race-based policies.

Ok, one simple question: If race shouldn’t be the main factor in judging individuals — ‘content of character, not color of skin’ — why should it be the main factor in drawing district lines to guarantee group outcomes?

The real Southern Strategy nostalgia here is from the side still obsessed with racial headcounts and perpetual victimhood. Read the opinion, and consider that colorblind redistricting isn’t regression—it’s progress.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

This logic would make MLK roll in his grave: judging districts (and voters) by the color of their skin rather than content of… well, anything else. The ruling doesn’t pretend racism is “dead.” It rejects the idea that the cure is more race-based government discrimination in perpetuity.

Institutions that “made America safe”? You mean the same intelligence community that: • Pushed the Russia collusion hoax. • Suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop as “disinfo.” • Spied on campaigns, leaked like sieves, and weaponized classifications against political opponents. Those institutions?

It’s a time-honored tradition to pretend that “leftists criticizing the media for being too obvious” (translation: “Why isn’t CNN just calling Trump a literal Nazi 24/7?”) is somehow intellectually identical to conservatives pointing out that the same outlets spent years laundering democrat hoaxes.

If transparency on finances is the real goal, push for simpler, clearer rules on all senior officials and candidates—not a Trump-specific retroactive purity test.

In five short years, the left went from “mostly peaceful protests” while cities burned, cops were beaten, statues toppled, and “defund the police” was mainstream Dem policy… to pearl-clutching that a compensation fund for people they call “insurrectionists” is the death of “Back the Blue.”

Presidents don’t “forge plans” in a vacuum like superhero geniuses. Inept would be pretending the mullahs respond to strongly worded letters and pallets of cash. Trump tried the other way. Cry about the sourcing all you want.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Real deep thinker, you.

It’s his call for judging people as individuals, not racial collectives (LITERALLY what the ruling is doing). He didn’t say it as a temporary tactical dream he’d later abandon for race-consciousness forever.

Ugh. Historical illiteracy mixed with libtard fan fiction. The ruling didn’t eliminate voting rights or “representation for Black communities.” It said states can’t let race predominate over traditional redistricting principles. IT IS LITERALLY ANTI-RACISM. Remember, content of character?

All you need to know about the modern left, and particularly, this shit stain of a platform, are the comments about someone’s spouse getting cancer.

The Court rightfully ruled that the Equal Protection Clause doesn’t have a racial-preference exception for favored groups FOREVER. The sky isn’t falling, it’s just less racially engineered.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

FYI Dems: Voters care more about actual election security and accurate lists than partisan scorekeeping from outlets that treat any scrutiny of the process as a threat to “our democracy.”