Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

The AI industry wants us to believe AI superintelligence is the real threat from generative AI. But that narrative was crafted to distract from the many ways genAI is being used to tear our societies apart, as we saw this week when a deepfake video rocked the Irish election. It must be reined in.

Generative AI is a societal disasterGovernments are deluding themselves into believing investment justifies allowing AI to upend societydisconnect.blog
Обсуждение

Ответы

After the real and ongoing harms visited on society by meta, Google, Amazon, et al and their data manipulation businesses you'd think we'd be able to insert ourselves into this conversation. Instead the corrupt American Gov't says no queries for 10 years and Canada appoints an unskilled sycophant.

AI 'superintelligence' is a big nothingburger. The real threat is in replacing the beginner entry-level jobs that are the onramp to talented mid-level jobs. AI is like the first-year intern that never learns past being a first-year intern.

Yes. The biggest threat to humanity remains the same as ever: humanity. These tools are just another way in which that threat manifests itself.

Misdirection 101; on PEDs thanks to the internet echo chamber.

Just for the sake of clarity (althought your point is still relevant): this is not *the* Irish election, as the Irish presidency is a figurehead position with minimal legal powers.

Ответ для Karl Burke

if i had more characters, i would have said that. the article is specific about the election and the role of the president.

One of the fundamental theories behind GenAI is "SEO hasn't made the web useless enough, so we need to find ways to produce cheaper content-free content to show more ads!"

When Trump claimed the Reagan quotes were AI he showed that bad actors don't even need to generate fake content; it's enough to convince people that AI means the truth is unknowable.

exactly this. the only people more delusional than the agi optimists are the agi doomers. it's manufactured opposition. never forget that the ai arms race was kicked off by that hinton guy's fear-mongering. it's all just part of the hype

Ответ для Caller

to be clear: ai investment is bad, but the danger is not superintelligence. that's stupid. there's no way billionaires would invest trillions into a technology that was going to "change everything". LLMs are the perfect tech for the investor class precisely because they cannot make anything new.

The AI narrative was carefully crafted. While Sam Altman talked about the wonderful things generative AI would enable, he knew critics would emerge. So the industry got there first, claiming AGI or superintelligence were the threat — not the present-day problems. disconnect.blog/generative-a...

Ответ для Paris Marx

The contrast between the fantastical superintelligence narrative and the tangible impacts of generative AI were impossible to ignore this week. Another pointless statement was released on superintelligence allowing prominent people to pat themselves on the back. disconnect.blog/generative-a...

Ответ для Paris Marx

he had a ton of help: • millennia of mythology and lore (beginning with eg golems, all the way up through robots and contemporary scifi, to say nothing of what started with dartmouth &c) • useful idiots who have been banging away about this for decades in that way ai is unique as an object of hype

Ответ для Paris Marx

Reminds me of the decades ago discourse over GMO. Some well meaning and some less reliable concerns over the idea of franken foods destroying the food web, misdirected attention from the impact of gene patents and over reliance on herbicide tolerant « round up ready » crops and use of glyphosate

Ответ для Paris Marx

See if you can spell fascism without AI!

we should consider banning such tools, in the same fashion of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. it has to be a global ban; no country is safe from the damages it causes.