I genuinely can't stop thinking about this piece of his someone shared earlier, in part because I sincerely can't work out which parts of it I am supposed to treat as "real" and which are "provocations" because surely, surely, the conclusion can't be real. www.theguardian.com/society/2003...
Rod Liddle: Should it really be a crime to look at child pornography?Rod Liddle: The one laudable and necessary aim - to protect children from abuse - has become warped by our consuming, obsessive hatred for those who find children sexually attractive.www.theguardian.comChairman MoëtSwift is a much weirder writer than is assumed by people who haven't read him, Liddle a much duller one than his eulogies suggest. The idea he was a satirist doesn't really work as he didn't write those things to shock or mock he wrote them because he believed them.