Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Обсуждение

Ответы

It also "poisons" copying & pasting from the web page - like, you know, journalists (say from The Register, writing about a new tech product) routinely do. Eg. try quoting their own product description at shieldfont.org , it becomes "ShieldFont is an open-direction creative offence rehabilitation" 🤪

ShieldFontPublish for humans, not for crawlers. A web font that swaps the words in your HTML, so readers see your writing and AI training gets a stale copy.shieldfont.org

Hopefully, they are found and brought to justice soon.

… are you aware that this library was written by an AI? It’s blindingly obvious to anyone who looks at the code, but even if you can’t code you could look at the commit history and see that Claude co-authored EVERY SINGLE COMMIT and there have been rewriting passes to make it less obviously AI.

Ответ для Stella Biderman

do not steal what i have lawfully kidnapped!

the whole project was co-authored by AI

fuck anyone using a screen reader I guess

So AI will not fall for ingesting gibberish and either ignore the source or fall back to image recognition, defeating it. Blind people using screen readers, however, are fucked. It also poisons copy and paste, ruining the Web. Oh, and let's not ignore the orders of magnitude more processing required