Публикация

to everyone getting mad, the director is actually 15 and was being interviewed in front of their parents

That's just not true. Nudity and sex on screen that's gratuitous or badly done is embarrassing. When done well I don't have a problem with it.

Then why did he bother putting it in there in the 1st place.

Nope nope nope

Haunting Adeline is about to be a movie btw but PeOpLE GeT uNcOmFOrTAbLE lol

This implies he shot heaps of sex and nudity, but then cut it. Perving is a directors privilege I guess?

Lmao a movie about hook ups promoting less showing of what a hook up looks like. Imagine if 40 shades of Grey followed the same philosophy.

Surely there's an app for Meta perv glasses where the sex scenes are re-inserted?

When I start a new show or series if the first scene is fucking scene I turn it off and move on

pathetic, we're so miserable these days...

go watch a gaspar noe film instead

So he filmed a lot of nudity for himself? Seems like something they could sue about

This is just the stupidest premise for a movie. EVER.

People aren’t uncomfortable with sexy scenes. What they *are* uncomfortable with is skeezy sexual harassers, and douchey manboys. Bridgerton has proven people aren’t uncomfortable at all and will binge it. The Omegaverse shows people are okay with… things. The internet has horns for porns.

........what is happening

I'm not a big fan of sex scenes in things that aren't porn. They almost never do anything for the story. I'm gonna guess that this movie is probably gonna be a movie.

So they're making a play to boost sales. Step 1, release the censored theatrical version, people go see it, then 2, release the uncensored cut, people go see it again. (And *maybe* years from now, 3, release the directors cut!)

Jesus Christ. This... might be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard in my entire 56 years of life.

What's that line about American puritainism? "Anyone could invent a strip club, only a society as repressed as America could invent Hooters, where all the staff are fully clothed, but you know they were hired for their boobs" something like that?

I guess they go to different cinemas...

Why chose him to direct such a movie? I hate how he's doing what he thinks other people want from him and not making ART.

"Audiences dislike sex on screen." Is this idiot completely unaware of the MILLIONS of dollars a month the porn industry makes?

Stop giving me reasons to skip this movie.

Boring!

But it’s a movie about sex that doesn’t want to show sex? Um, ok.

Don’t make me tap the ‘It’s not the job of the artist to give the audience what the audience wants. If the audience knew what they needed, then they wouldn’t be the audience. They would be the artists. It is the job of artists to give the audience what they need.’ Alan Moore quote sign again…

skill issue

i call bullshit

Why are we even talking about a movie no one has heard of, with a cast barely anyone knows, and a director no one knows, that will be forgotten less than 24 hours after it's release, with a box office return that is embarrassing. Dumbass flic. Entertainment "news" may not be your forte, guys.

Squidward's Sarcastic 'Wow'ALT: Squidward's Sarcastic 'Wow'static.klipy.com

Cool, sounds like shit

Way to pre-publicize the “unfiltered directors cut” release in 18 months…

release the r-rated version!! if i go to see such a blah premise, i might as well get nudity out of it

Nudity as such isn't a problem as long as it really does promote the story. Nudity and sex scenes for the sake of nudity and sex scenes is what really bores and annoys me.

so they filmed a bunch of sex scenes just so they could see everyone naked and then decide to not put it in the movie lol hmmmmmmmmm

Ughhhh why did the puritan movement have to steal Gen Z and ruin everythingggggugh 🙄🙄🙈

This does not seem like the best approach to promoting a movie about sex

Gluck works in an industry famous for glorifying gore and graphic human violence. He's clearly talking about the mumsnet lot pushing hard core Christian nonsense on us all. Gluck needs calling out on this.

This is what my therapist calls "projection"

His audience is addicted to internet porn.

There are no longer "adult situations." Americans haven't acted like adults for decades.

We only like seeing sex between clothed people. Is there a lot of dry humping? Note: I have absolutely no idea what this movie is about.

For someone named Gluck he seems pretty joyless

Did he cut out your alt text, too?

"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a scrambled sex channel."

I came here to see full frontal nudity and I won't leave this theatre until I do

Everyone is going to call me a prude, but I'm fine with cutting out most nudity. There's still some nudity, so it's not like they removed all of it, but I'm asexual myself and seeing sex/ more explicit stuff on screen actively drives me away. This might be an OK medium.

*Taps the sign*

Everyone Is Beautiful and No One Is Horny - Blood KnifeThe human body has become a strange contradiction at the heart of the modern blockbuster. Sexy, yes. But sexual? No.bloodknife.com

This is dumb. This is prudish nonsense, and it’s super dumb. But since the concept of the movie is dumb, I guess I’m not surprised.

Looks like I'm buying a Blue Ray player for that director's cut

Ridiculous.

They’re uncomfortable because they have boners in public and they’re kinda bent up in their jeans. Should have worn a trench coat.

Even the actors look uncomfortable

thank god this isn't a movie about only getting to have sex one night a year or this would be profoundly moronic and ridiculous

The director sounds like a prude. Must be MAGA. 😂

Literally anyone that doesn't watch porn is weird

“Whenever people now see nudity or very adult situations in a big theater, they get uncomfortable.” Interesting. Very much so. Can someone please point out who's "people"? Where are your sources? What methods did you use to glean this information? Were there surveys taken? Give me something

Bring back well-made sex scenes that make a movie erotic and exciting. Also bring back bad gratuitous nudity that is just there to titillate horny people.

I'm getting sick of this prudish mindset.

This is like making a Fast and Furious movie but cutting out all the muscle cars because they aren’t environmentally friendly.

I saw the previews in the theater a couple of months ago and it just looked dumb. Sorry, Callum Turner is not hot enough to be a leading man 🤷‍♀️

choosing that shirt on his one chance a year to convince a woman to fuck him requires an in-universe justification and it better be good

probably because those scenes have no chemistry and they are made with the blandest human beings in mind, maybe if they involved anybody who has ever actually had sex in the making of these they would turn out to be interesting

JHFC

Now I have two reasons not to watch this movie.

The premise of the movie sounds pretty dumb to begin with.

Well, if you're watching with your kids or parents maybe, but we're talking about different genres.

One Night Only (2026)

Agree with Gluck, media is overly sex-saturated... and gory violence. It's in your face constantly. There's more to life and human relations than fcking and fighting. It was great taking a teen to the Odyssey and not having to sit through graphic sex and violence, that makes both of us cringe.

I finally saw The Purge recently (i’m nothing if not on top of the bleeding edge of popular culture), and if the Sex Purge contained as much sex as The Purge contains violence it would probably look like one of those Times Square movies that Travis Bickle took Cybill Shepard to see in Taxi Driver

a director should make the vision they have, sex or not, coz it's their film being done how they want. Do what you want and own your vision, right?

So he just filmed a bunch of nude scenes for himself?

I miss the 80's...

Why is everyone getting upset by a director making a film the way they want to?

I’m ace and sometimes legit get sex repulsion … even I’m baffled by this director’s statements. What is wrong with him? He should be studied in a lab.

Not interested in seeing people using their bathroom; or other people having sex People are uncomfortable with nudity, because the purpose is money, not art or quality.Producers used to say "sex sell" Also, many actors said they were pressured to film nude &sex scenes that they weren’t comfortable

Did this guy just create his own personal spank bank?

yeah you can’t cast a guy that looks like that and put her in that dress and think “this audience won’t like sex”.

The movie is literally the purge for sex…wtf is he talking about?

Gotta appeal to the Gen Z audience that hates sex and nudity. Very normal choice for a movie about sex.

Young people ruining movies...

so the movie about single people only having one day a year to legally have sex had nude scenes cut because "people dislike sex on screen" i'm sorry for saying this movie was made by straight redditors. it was made by straight 4channers

Just in case you’re not aware, this movie is perfect for the Christian Nationalists in your life. 🚮

I guess Howard Hughes finally got his answer.

Видео

Will Gluck should grow the fuck up

It sounds like the Television Code is creeping it's way back into media.

So as not to make the audience uncomfortable, Gluck replaced the nudity with machine guns.

So they made the actors film it and then were like nah too yucky?

Maybe he should try making good movies

Being a bit mean to the teens. Perhaps he's going for an older viewership.

Because Christians hate fun.

#ICYMI 🚆 🚕 🗽 New Yorkers who dress like this call a taxi. They don't climb stairs to board a subway train. 🎦 When a Fascist plot decides to suppress nudity, after having a script based on suppressing extramarital sex except for one day a year = a Margaret Atwood novel meets "The Purge."

Critically discuss Sydney Sweeney's career whilst using Gluck's framing of 'audiences dislike sex scenes'. 30 marks

why not set the film during the other 8748 hours of the year

Honestly I dont think this guy should be making movies about sex.

It's a movie about a sex Purge tho.

A satire about puritanism that does unironic puritan creative choices is not a satire. Just puritan propaganda.

true

many of the greatest 80’s movies have sex/show nudity. Fucking Christians are why it’s no longer deemed acceptable. They ruin everything.

I'm already sick of all of the censorship, nothing but Christian ads on every Android game, Christian propaganda movies online, the prudishness, and the holier than thou attitude. Their God sent us in this world naked, for the record. Who/what is causing this newest wave of censorship?

let me make the purge but nobody does crime on the one night crime is legal

So Winterbottom’s 9 Songs should have just been 9 Songs? I don’t like Franz Ferdinand enough for that. And watching The Dandy Warhols in a cinema makes me feel uncomfortable.

And yet movie goers never get upset by bloody violence.

People have been used to seeing adult content in movies for several years. Sex comedies, erotic thrillers, you name it. Will Gluck (or should I say "Will Cuck") has no idea what he's talking about.

Everyone replying to this about how it's puritanical fails to realize that just because YOU like nudity in film, not everyone does. Fabricated sex scenes are just weird to me. I'd rather watch porn. And most of the time, it's not for the plot. This movie is just going to suck with or w/o nudity.

Weird that he filmed it then, and very strange flex to go on about the lowly public not being able to handle how much he was seeing the actors naked

Thanks a LOT, Gluck.

He makes a movie whose central theme is sex... but says "no sex (nudity / adult situations) please"?

Man Says 'But...' and Looks ThoughtfulAlt: Scene from Castle: Main character Castle, played by Nathan Fillion, raises his hand, says 'But...' and then just gives up with an exasperated expression.static.klipy.com

Isn't it more that people can get "erotic" entertainment elsewhere these days? Lol

this movie sounds so stupid and then they do this? clown

I guess they’re more concerned about the exploitation than the nudity. Historically women were coerced to film nude scenes to satisfy the director not the story.

bruh you made a sex comedy

Making cast & crew film a bunch of sex scenes that never hit the reel lol

Gluck like the noise he can make around my cock for this

The problem isn't sex or nudity. The problem is when it's one sided and exploitative (mostly to women) in nature. Most adults don't mind equal opportunity nudity or a good on screen romp, especially in a movie about adults having sex. The Sam Levinsons of the world need to f*ck all the way off.

You do plan on having sex scenes on your sex movie, right?

"We know they're uncomfortable because there is a lot of body shifting, what looks like thigh squeezing, breathing becomes more regular and deeper. All the unmistakable signs of uncomfortableness." ~

I watch movies for the praying. Although I will occasionally enjoy a bit of ankle.

I don't mind nudity one bit. 🤷🏼‍♀️

We are all excited about a movie where a woman bangs a basket man. We can handle nudity. Just do it right.

WILL GLUCK? THE DIRECTOR OF EASY A? PANDERING TO GEN Z PURITANISM?

puritans think everyone is a puritan because they've already dehumanised anyone who isn't

It's remarkable how at war with itself this movie seems to be. The premise revolves around a ghoulish & overtly fascist dystopia. Yet it's a fun, light-hearted rom-com! The plot is about people only having one day to fuck. It features zero sex or nudity. What the shit is this fuckness?

Doesn't make me uncomfortable. Signals to me, weak writer, weak story. Nothing rips you out of a movie quicker than a softporn as a long, unnecessary surprise cameo. Any movie with a sex scene, would be fine, if not BETTER, without it. (9 1/2 weeks, without sex scenes, bombs, as it should)

Say you're an Evangelical grifter without saying your an Evangelical grifter

People lol’d before our Odyseey show when this preview aired

Do people hate seeing sex and nudity on film now? Really? I’d argue audiences don’t mind those scenes (and maybe even enjoy them) in the right context. They don’t stop good films from achieving critical or financial success.

But comfortable with gratuitous violence on the big screen. Can you see the problem.

So she's in a duct tape halter top and he gets to wear a comfy polo? 👎

Will Guckguck more like, because this guy SUUUUUUUUCKS

Seems like a horror film for people afraid of sex.

So in other words, they cut several nude scenes to not risk it getting an X-rating. Thus harming it's box office receipts.

But he shot the scenes anyway because... giggity?

People are fuckin’ prudes my gosh

Good work everybody…

I’m very uncomfortable with this photo

Weirdo

release the ranchy cut!

Himym How I Met Your MotherALT: Himym How I Met Your Motherstatic.klipy.com

As a potential audience member, what?

What a dumb ass. Can studios really not find actual directors anymore? (These are the directors they want so they control the product and there’s literally no artistic vision.)

I guess Callum Turner doesn't agree, considering he's currently playing the Sam Neill role in a remake of Andrzej Żuławski's cult psychosexual freakout POSSESSION - which didn't contain much, if any nudity, but a whole lot of decidedly uncomfortable "adult situations".

Nah we just uncomfortable with hetero sex. Gay sex is what the people want!

Shoulda left it in. No one’s watching this in a crowded theater anyways

I think he means horny

Cowards

Courting Gen-Z by saying there will be no sex in your sex movie.

Help! Help! I watched a movie and it made me feel something! Make it stop!

Everything I’ve heard about this film makes me wish I’d never heard of this film.

I suspect Blu-Ray sales will be astronomical due to the Deleted Footage feature!

The best way to avoid nudity on the big screen is to …. not go in ….

Genuinely crazy how many accomplished people will go online and believe themselves to be in the midst of the purest barometer of public opinion in existence.

These considerations are typically made prior to filming. Especially when the director has such an advanced grasp of what audiences will or will not tolerate. Sounds like some actual penetration happened and now he’s sorry.

society has progressed beyond the need for puritans to be involved in making films

Oh fuck off. You just didn’t want an NC17 rating on your weird sex fascism movie.

Even this is too much nudity I can see the side of her breast

When did movie directors start to worry people getting uncomfortable? What kind of world it’s turning into…

When NOBODY goes to SEE this unrealistic movie, Gluck will rethink.

Puritanism is always a redflag.

So he, the director, cut out "so much" sex he had filmed, because he didn't want nudity in his film...? Sounds more like him wanting to film stacks of porn for himself 🤷🏼‍♀️ Idk about everyone else, but if I was a director, I'd find it easy not to accidentally film people having sex if I didn't want to.

Guy's name is "gluck".

Mr. Gluck is clearly a moron then. Release the uncut version to streaming, where people can decide if they want to watch it or not. Or if that's too big a risk, if the movie does well in the box office, sell a digital & maybe physical copy of the uncut movie, if those scenes still exist.

Show us the fucking you coward

yeah idk... i feel like producers didn't have this problem in the 00s, but we had these things called DVDs that people could buy so they can watch raunchy movies at home.

I'll wait for the director's cut, thank you.

Sounds like a skill issue, tbh

what is going on with those outfits where is this dude's jacket he looks like he's about to knock back a cold one with the boys and she's dressed for a night out show some respect anyway this movie sounded dumb when I assumed it was gonna be softcore porn and now it's not even that

might as well cut out the rest of the movie too then

I just hope the adult film industry runs with "sex purge". Like, this is the best plot for an adult film.

I know this guy is getting a lot of heat for this (even from me,) but the fact that the scenes were shot in the first place makes me think that what he's saying is based on the feedback from the test screenings. I'd be curious to know if there was a harder version of the film that was softened.

what is this - the 4th grade? what a creepy douche bag!

Lame ass.

Will Gluck for what?

lest we forget

why would you make a sex comedy about The Night Of All The Fuck and have no fucking in it

Is it because it's going straight to the Hallmark channel? And I do mean straight

WTF? I mean, if it’s unrelated to the movie I get it, but the movie is called “One Night Only”. Regardless, the movie looks pretty bad

You made the sex purge. people going to see a film about a sex purge will probably be ok with seeing sex.

LOL, that feckin’ eejit.

'ONE NIGHT ONLY' director Will Gluck says they cut out "so much nudity" from the film because otherwise audiences might think his sex movie is about sex.

So the director just wanted to watch these actors in the nude - not actually make a movie about it.

You know he don't give Gluck Gluck for free

A great marketing ploy would be to release both versions in major cities and track which one does better.

Puritans

Dropout Dropout TvAlt: Dropout Dropout Tvstatic.klipy.com

A supposed romcom in a dystopian nightmare and it’s all about sex except we don’t see any of the hints of sex. Great film Mr Gluck

Some of us are grown ass men with genitals.

Didn't stop 'em filming it, though?

This sounds like a small leap into Gilead. If you are afraid of sex, the very thing that made you, maybe you should go see a pyschologist. That is extremely abnormal behavior and thinking. Saying you don't want to see sex in a movie is like saying you don't want to see people eat, drink, or sleep.

we can cut all the nudity from movies and we can't even fix a horse's bones

Violence on screen, sex in books. 'mer'ca

So, count me as someone who won’t see the film. Not because I just have to see nudity—there’s plenty to see on the internet and other films. It will be because I won’t let someone else “determine” what I should dislike or what I should see. Are the “fundamentalist righteous ones” influencing him?

A bizarre puritanism is on the rise again. Another sign of fascism.

whenever I see naked people in a movie I am watching in theaters I start jacking off

So if they were just going to cut it out why did he film it?

She's fully dressed in this picture and you can see half of a boob.

If we're being honest with ourselves nudity and sex in cinema has pretty much played itself out. It would be rare for a picture to require it.

Please use alt-text on your images