Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Projection so powerful, you could screen the Odyssey in 70MM IMAX from it.

Обсуждение

Ответы

Let's see. By the laws of projection, Rowling right here is declaring either guilt or intent, and the subject is tyrannically lording over a community and forcing the community to share her beliefs or else. Checks out.

snort what a pompous load of rat turds she is

What a fucking liar she is. She doesn't even believe that nonsense. Her bullshit is Trumpian.

I wonder how big the chances are Amnesty caves & yet she still takes them to court just out of spite...

Ответ для Brookie Shields 🏳️‍⚧️

I think they should stick it out.

Ответ для Brookie Shields 🏳️‍⚧️

They’ve apparently agreed to meet Sex Matters……

Frankly, I'm sick of listening to this woman whine about her rights. She doesn't think for a second that her speech is infringing on the rights of someone else especially because shes a well know figure.

Ответ для Rachel Wales

She poisons the "room" for them, makes them a target for harassment. She can't have ever been hurt in this way herself because if she had she would shut the f up. Cry me a river.

A person's gender isnt subject to Ms. Rowling's "belief", anymore than what time of day the sun rises is subject to her "belief". Sunrise is an objective fact. As the saying goes a right to freely swing an arm ends at my nose. If the speech endangers another human being, its not protected.

Criticism is persecution, apparently.

"I don't care about individuals" We know

I had forgotten she exists - that made me happy...

I don't think amnesty international was a big defender of free speech. like isn't their main concern is the universal declaration of human rights and article 19 (which is the one about freedom of expression) does include that its a conditional right not an absolute one.

Ответ для spoonyhudson bones hurty

like im quoteing here but "[f]or the protection of national security or public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals" are listed as reasons to limit and like you can argue Rowling has hit all those reasons to remove it aside from national security (for now)

I don’t know what she’s referring to, but it sure sounds like the United States under Trump

It’s small but it’s wild that they think supporting trans rights is “virtue signaling” because, if you break that down, in order to SIGNAL virtue through an action, the action itself must inherently be a virtue…. So they know they’re wrong… right? They have to?…

Self-contradicting as well. But what to expect from the writer of phrenology academy?

Money clearly doesn’t buy class.

Unreal

"I don't care about individuals." might be one of the most honest things she's ever said, if she meant it in a different context.

Who actively says that out loud.

I've never genuinely wished the absolute worst upon people this much before, but the last two years have given me a list of people I genuinely hope go through the worst events in aaaaaallllll of human history.

Ответ для Hollow Star

I hope they go through all the worst events of human future-y. C'mon, give us the new hotness of awful stuff to happen to 'em. Gimme something I didn't even know I wanted them to go through but am delighted they do!

JK Rowling doesn’t get to opine on the validity of any human.

That monster is never going to stop until that monster is stopped. Better find ways to financially bankrupt or severely reduced that monster’s wealth where can’t file numerous lawsuits. Boycotting is one way but it’s not enough.

Ответ для 猫くノ一

Her work is garbage. Best bet isn't to organize boycotts but to criticize her slop and keep pointing out it's flaws.

Ответ для 猫くノ一

My smart follower here Temo is on to something. It’s know that monster is a holocaust denier. So print this out put this anywhere you see Harry Potty 🚽 books or merchandise around. It’ll get the “normies” to question it and they’ll look it up that monster is a Nazi!

Ответ для 猫くノ一

I'm genuinely waiting for someone just get tired of her and turn to vigilante matters. Frankly im surprised it hasnt happened already like it has with the d bag ai ceos being shot at. But I suppose that requires not sitting in a house filled with black mold.

It's crazy that she doesn't see that her argument is identical to the racists who complain about being "persecuted for thought crimes."

At some point we all need to sue JKR for punitive damages for her genocidal crusade. Her gazillions would build a lot of trans clinics.

this is just paranoia. is she doing the same drugs Elon is doing?

She’s got that special combination of wicked malice and unremitting psychosis you see in the best obsessive bigots.

She is the worst

She’s literally the worst

The utter lack of self-awareness from these billionaire class sociopaths… between her and Musk I don’t know how the UK policymakers justify using these people to speak for these issues… 😡

She fucking sucks and her following has been giving me and my friends hell all week. she's a terrorist.

"Persecutes": writing an article complaining about them... stand aside Stalin.

What’s going on with Amnesty? Im not up to date

Ответ для Laren 🇵🇷🏳️‍🌈

Listed anti-trans hate groups as "Anti-rights" groups in a hate report, groups Rowling supports got big mad and threatened to sue for defamation and she offered to bankroll the lawsuits.

Ответ для Laren 🇵🇷🏳️‍🌈

Rowling was mad that the main women's shelter in her home city had a trans woman in charge, so she set up a new, explicitly trans-exclusionary shelter, and then Amnesty International pointed out that it was trans-exclusionary so she sued them. www.bbc.com/news/article...

Amnesty 'regret' over JK Rowling sex assault centre criticismThe human rights charity had characterised the women-only service in Edinburgh as "anti-rights".www.bbc.com

Clearly no mirrors in castle Rowling

Ответ для I'm not Siouxsie (obviously)

Tons of mold tho lol

Ответ для I'm not Siouxsie (obviously)

Only the Mirror of Dertah. Never did find out what it does, though.

The projector is screening "Harry Potter and the DARVO Queen"

WTF “It no longer champions freedom of speech and belief” They should always be fighting “speech and belief” that results in oppression and persecution of the vulnerable. Please Ms Rowling - sit down, shut up, and find a qualified psychotherapist to help you with your inner demons.

It Wasn't Me, It Was My DemonALT: It Wasn't Me, It Was My Demonstatic.klipy.com

Damn, I'm stealing that to replace my old 'point them at a wall and do PowerPoint' line.

It's just virtue signaling but also sincerely held beliefs they will never change? Okay, dude. You dumb asshole.

"I don't care about individuals..." Not surprised, but still stunning that she would say that out loud, and still talk like she's defending human rights.

The enemy is wiley, and conspiratorial, and is both weak and strong.

Really sick of billionaire terrorism.

“It has become a tyrant the opposes free speech and belief” — person who is suing amnesty international for exercising free speech and belief.

Ответ для Sobekhotep 🐊

That*

so cool that she feels totally safe tweeting "I am a vexatious litigant"

This form of fascism is so much easier to read than the 20th century versions.

Billions bought Rowling the right to express her innate cuntiness, and she’s having a field day.

She was once an employee of Amnesty.

Ответ для KB

And got fired for not doing her job & instead writing stories while at work.

amazing that she didn't see it. Some friend should have said "did you read what you wrote?", but if she has any friends nowadays they're all Death Eaters anyway

Ответ для Perminio

She has compared trans people to death eaters. She doesn’t see it.

She really doesn’t believe she was limiting Amnesty’s freedom of speech by sending her ghoulish lawyers on them, does she?

Ответ для Chloe Kate

These shit baggers never see their own guilt.

Ответ для Chloe Kate

Free speech for me, but not for thee

Just saying "I don't care about individuals." Freudian slip. And despite thinking that freedom of speech is important, personally, it's not generally agreed to be a universal right much less the most fundamental. Does she know what Amnesty does, even?

Ответ для John Flournoy

turns out I don't, I guess they are into free speech

this fucking freak

Ответ для 𝙱𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚅𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚛𝚎 𝚂𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛

That's the Right's whole thing. Accuse people who disagree with you of violating your rights for disgreeing.

She writes like an annoying teenager.

What exactly does she believe is the "threat" that trans people pose to human rights. How does expanding the definition of women and rejecting gender rules damage women in any way? She will never admit it, but she is furthering a sex-based caste system.

Ответ для Rotwitch1322

It is ludicrous that a "just" society assigns different value to people based on how they were born. That includes class AND sex. This is why trans rights are inherently leftist values like feminism and socialism, because if we lose them our society becomes increasingly divided by status at birth.

Tell the difference between hers and elons tweets challenge level: impossible

Sister believe she is part of the good guys by, I quote : "Sueing amnesthy intenational. An ONG who defend human right and seek to abolish torture"

GODS, I am tired of all these bigots, get a damn HOBBY like the rest of us!!

Ответ для Duchess Van Hoof

That is their hobby, and their entire life in many cases.

Conservatives constantly equate being criticized for speech with having the government restrict their speech. Amnesty never championed the right to say whatever bigoted thing you wanted without being criticized or named in a report for it. This false equivalence needs much more pushback.

excuse my ignorance on this issue, but wtf happened to her that she has seemingly made it into an obsession to continuously post about trans folks? anyone know?

Ответ для lro70

Riley's law. www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?t...

Urban Dictionary: Riley's LawRiley's Law: Riley’s Law is an internet law coined by Riley Quinn of the TrashFuture podcast. It states that, "Once you post transphobia, you never post...www.urbandictionary.com

"I don't care about individuals." Got it.

"Rights & respect for me, and not for thee." Btw IIRC, in her 20s she worked briefly for Amnesty, and was let go, reportedly for slacking off on the job.