Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Обсуждение

196 прямых ответов · 308 сообщений

Показаны не все ответы

Публичный счётчик показывает 1350, а источник передал 196. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.

Are you seriously this fucking dense?! Fucking corporate shills. Begone

Has Politico ever said - MAGA didn't get the big election night they wanted? Just asking.

Ответ для Magicman

♥️

Ответ для Magicman

Yes!!!

Yes they did.

Lmao shut the fuck up dorks

I seem to remember in 2016, Hillary graciously conceded the primary for president to Barack Obama. The democrats and an array of other voters got behind Obama and gave us one of our best presidents. Good lesson to learn.

He won and Stevens and McMorrow both conceded with much more grace than this petulant little article

Outspent by a factor of 10? Won? That’s a good result.

With all due respect, FOH

Ответ для Ferengi Liason to the New Vegas Strip

They're bigly mad, they had scores of "progressives fail outside of blue cities" pieces lined up to run

Yes they did. A win is a win is a win is a win.

Erm....You may want to rewrite that... bsky.app/profile/edon...

edonalife

He had a big night..... Maybe..."El-Sayed is somebody who channels people who don't want the establishment to run and to reign" Couldn't have put it better myself. Maybe this means the people can actually choose for themselves. Maybe $ 50 million is not enough to distract people. What a waste!

Did AIPAC pay you to write this B.S......?! 😂🤣🥴🥴 How disparate do you have to be or perhaps you are slobbering and bootlicking felons shitty boots? @politico.com

that guy won, you know. that guy in the picture. he won his election.

LOL....nice try....actually it was a lousy try.

Baloney!

How to admit your preferred AIPAC-supported candidate lost (despite overspending by a factor of 10) without admitting you lost, too

They don't ask how, they ask how many.

That’s some serious gaslighting and denial you got going on there, Politico. The progressives won, live with it.

Politico trying to downplay this is probably a net benefit for AES, since they strongly prefer MAGA anyway.

@politico.com is thinly veiled Republican propaganda, not journalism.

hey man, who won?

You're paid to say that tbh

Loser behavior lol

Delusional cope by centrists.

Cooooope

Politico is owned by Nazis

How lmfao they got outspent 10-1 and won

KINDA LIKE YOUR DATE NIGHTS HUH.

YOU SOUND SCARED @politico.com

Ответ для Hierophant Shelley B Woke - Living Saint of Purity🏳️‍⚧️🖤💜🤍 💛

🔥

Which means, in fact, the Progressives did. The republicans did NOT get what they paid for. Hilarious.

Ответ для DancesWithBees 💙 Wildly at Peace 🦋

Actually, GOP is likely happy. They think AES is the weaker candidate.

Публикация скрыта фильтром безопасности.
Ответ для Debbie Lefkowitz

They actually don't. They are terrified of him, which is why they've been running the exact same hit peices against him as third way.

Awww. The Nazis at Axel Springer / Politico are in their feelings and coping by lying - as usual. Progressives won major house primaries and Michigan senate primary despite being outspent 10-1. Winning isn’t big? 🤡

You had this article ready to publish no matter what happened, huh?

Ответ для Waffle House of the Dragon

😂😂😂

Ответ для Waffle House of the Dragon

Maybe you should learn who owns and operates Politico.

This isn't the hot take you imagined.

Move them goalposts

Ответ для Kate Crowe

Who cares, he won

😂🖕

And yet every one of his opponents has gotten behind him. Seems like a pretty big win to me.

More of the same dems in disarray, Politico. Maybe focus on the canyon wide difference between republicans voters and their republican elected officials. Geez

He was outspent 10 to 1. I’d say that’s pretty impressive.

Politico: part of the problem. Politico: News by cucks

Yes we did. Try telling the truth.

Stay mad, losers.

"Progressives beat the odds when 70 mil was spent against them." There I fixed your shitty article. This is why not a single soul likes you guys. Writing slander pieces after a historic win.

fuck right off into the sun

yes we did

Winning is winning

the opposition spent 10x the amount of money to lose, I’d say that’s pretty big?

That's a guess and a headline. I have faith in American recovery.

It must suck seeing everything you’ve worked for your entire lives crumble before your eyes.

Politicio exposes self as anti popular public sentiment.

Very fake news

Seriously this is so embarassing ffs have some parody of dignity.

Y'all are pathetic pissy pants losers.

What's interesting is the same people who own Politico are the same people trying to undermine our democracy. Politico is owned by german based Axel Springer SE who is in turn 36% owned by the $758 billion NYC based Investment firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co Kravis is a member of Thiels' Dialog

bsky.app/profile/jera...

Jeramy Olmack

What's interesting is the same people who own Politico are the same people trying to undermine our democracy. Politico is owned by german based Axel Springer SE who is in turn 36% owned by the $758 billion NYC based Investment firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co Kravis is a member of Thiels' Dialog

Since the 1960s, Springer publishing is a propaganda outlet of the rich. Springer is the German equivalent to Murdoch.

Ответ для Mr. T

Actually did not know that, ty.

Maybe not “night”, but certainly got the results they wanted

The German company forever loyal to Israel is trying some desperate coping spin over this?

why did you make him look so dark in the photo? that's rhetorical.

Nah El-Sayad is awesome.

Bro he won. What a ridiculously strange article

I guess $70m buys you a close loss than with a terrible candidate

B

With a 60 million spending gap? They sure did.

Thanks for reminding me why I don't follow politico

K

Embarrassing analysis politifake

Wow, really? Who won?

How embarassing you're this amount of rubbish, don't most primaries end in a narrow win?

I'm just here to add to your BIG, ugly and very well deserved ratio. you're welcome!

Typical propaganda headline from Politico.

You're full of shit.

legacy ass media headline

Well as of posting you have 58 idiots who still fall for your bullshit, so good on you I guess? Progressives won, get over it, damn time the establishment were the ones that fell in line to a new party.

oh you big mad

Trump has taken a literal and figurative wrecking ball to our country but you guys still lean in on "Dems in disarray". 🤡

You don't have to keep proving you're clueless. Everyone already knows. Now go back to writing puff pieces about the criminals in the Republican Party.

Big time cope reporting from POLITICO

Ответ для Box of Frogs

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Ответ для Box of Frogs

Drinking hateraid all day. All week

German owned company detected

Get bent, losers

Cope

Politico has a very conservative owner. Why would he admit that progressives had a good night?

Ответ для Moolah1962

He’s a right wing douchebag. It’s a vanity project for him.

Ответ для Moolah1962

Because they didn't. They failed in many races, were not resoundingly supported. Face the fact it's marginal. They will have to work, not sail into the general. Let's see if they will.

What a bunch of dipshits. Can you not count?!

Not one but two unnamed “Democratic operatives” are your sources of the “deep divisions.” You’re certainly committed to the bit.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

What are the odds that these operatives were made up whole cloth, on the spot. High, I wager.

Ответ для Updog

The Baileys!

Ответ для maryjane

The Krassensteins lol

Ответ для Sascha_Vykos2

😆

Ответ для maryjane

Honestly no clue who these are and please let me keep that figment of sweet summer child lol

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

You lucky, lucky man I would not dream of ruining that for you.

Ответ для Sascha_Vykos2

He glows

Ответ для Sascha_Vykos2

Why did you have to remind me of them

Ответ для Andy
Ответ для Sascha_Vykos2
Ответ для Sascha_Vykos2

Ain't that the fkn truth. God those people are ridiculous.

Ответ для maryjane

Here you go.

Ответ для DougofGabriola🇨🇦

cheers!

Ответ для Updog

Nah plenty exist. It’s a yuge party. But “operative” is one of the weakest descriptors possible so just randos with Politico-impressing titles or good name droppers.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

There are plenty of "operatives" who would be eager to speak on the record about this, such as James Carville or reps like Tom Suozzi. But leaving them unnamed serves a purpose, even if they are prominent. It implies the progressives are dangerous and that moderates are being forced underground.

Ответ для Updog

No I definitely think they exist, but I’m pretty sure the author of this piece probably has cocktails with them every Saturday. Politico reporters very rarely venture beyond personal friends for sources.

Ответ для Updog

Nah. They know which middling hacks who think they're Important Playahs will give them the exact quote they need to fill the narrative slot they leave for them, thereby satisfying editorial rituals without being unduly inconvenienced by those rituals' original ethical and reputational purposes.

Ответ для Updog

some old stoner in a suit wearing tinted glasses and some old cajun guy, I bet.

Ответ для Updog

Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are reliable as fug.

Ответ для Updog

Well one could be fetterman.

Ответ для Updog

Nah, they have people this cynical. They usually spend every waking moment pissing and moaning about Hasan Piker

Ответ для Updog

I came here for the ratio.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Those sources? James Carville and Hailey Stevens

Ответ для justin | Destroy ICE

Nah on Stevens - Politico would say “a source close to the Stevens campaign” or “close to the race” and not the wimpiest of “operative.”

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona
Ответ для Cranky Northerner 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

Ha. bsky.app/profile/tvbo...

Thomas V. Bona

Doubtful. He wouldn’t anonymously give away what he can do publicly for grift. There are plenty like him who will do it for free. It’s a yuge party. Could be any rando with a Politico-impressing title or name-dropping. That’s the problem with letting these outlets tell us how to feel.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

One of them was definitely James Carville. A twisted lich whose entire media existence is to be a critic of left of center politics.

Ответ для Revan McCallister

Doubtful. He wouldn’t anonymously give away what he can do publicly for grift. There are plenty like him who will do it for free. It’s a yuge party. Could be any rando with a Politico-impressing title or name-dropping. That’s the problem with letting these outlets tell us how to feel.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

“These guys are unbelievably cocky” is an interesting quote because it shows how entitled the establishment of the party is and how annoyed they are that the rest of us won’t just get in line and take orders from them but that point was lost on the authors.

Ответ для The Medium Lebowski

Clearly the anonymous “operative” is “the establishment of the party” and not a whiny member of a faction that hates losing. 🙄

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Insert “why not both” meme here

Ответ для The Medium Lebowski

Dance when Politico says dance I guess.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

I would be willing to wager a large sum that at least one of those democratic operatives is Lis Smith

Ответ для Fist of the Nice Star

At least one 🤣🤣🤣

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

She was directly quoted in the NYT story I just read 😂😂

Ответ для Corey
Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

INDEED!!

Ответ для Fist of the Nice Star

Neera Tanden is the other I bet.

Ответ для Fist of the Nice Star

They're both Lis Smith (mitosis)

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Why do we care what OG nazis think of Democratic primaries?

Ответ для Wizzy Probs

Who?

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

You are so right, Repugnants are shitting them self right now. They wanted Stevens. I doubt Rogers will even want to debate!

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Oh yes, there are deep divisions.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

This is why Politico Boss Reportedly Demands Allegiance to Israel From Editorial Staff The publication’s parent company, Axel Springer, considers Israel’s right to exist one of its “essential” values. truthout.org/articles/pol...

Politico Boss Reportedly Demands Allegiance to Israel From Editorial StaffThe publication’s parent company, Axel Springer, considers Israel’s right to exist one of its “essential” values.truthout.org
Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Pushing a narrative to stir sh@#. Dems WILL rally behind the nominee(s). They're 100% UNITED to beat Trumpet + GOP.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

broke brooklyn dad and Carville?

Ответ для wharf rat

Wait. Aren't those the same guy?

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Politico is and always has been a right-wing propaganda factory with just the slightest veneer of respectability vis a vis Newsmax.

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

Flintstones, meet the Flintstones…

Ответ для Thomas V. Bona

The CEO of yhe parent company is an unconditional supporter of Israel. They trying to paint a massive progreesive victory over Israel lobby spending as a mistake for the party RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES.

counterpoint: a close primary election is a good thing. its democratic. Michiganders had a choice to make and they didn’t take the choice lightly. Time for moderate dems, who may not love AES, to put up or shut up

The morning, on the other hand, 🎉

Публикация скрыта фильтром безопасности.

Hey politico, your framing is dog shit. You guys are all in on the Trump Regime, huh?

NO, WE GOT IT.

i too love writing delusional fan fiction

That sound you hear is the Overton window 🪟 sliding left, whether you like it or not! 🇺🇸

Your framing should make everyone involved think very hard: why again, did I take this job?

Ответ для Alexander Diehl

Because they're Nazis but they don't want to be kicked out of polite society.

Ответ для Alexander Diehl

"Daddy said if I didn't take the job with Politico, he would give the rest of my trust fund to Peter Thiel."

Hah, hahaha... Christ, you guys are desperate. Outspent TEN TO ONE! Still won. How's that for a tagline?

Moves the goalposts much?

Ответ для JT Jag (Support Unions)

The owner is MAGA

They won, but we demand that they win bigger before we say that it counts. Uh... yeah. 🙄🙄

Ответ для JR Tomlin (she/her)

literally the GOP playbook every win is proof of a mandate to govern, every loss is somehow proof your opponent is undeserving

Ответ для JR Tomlin (she/her)

THEY said they'd sweep the primaries. They failed. They said Abdul would win by 25 points. Nope. All anyone is saying is that it's not a "mandate" at all. Since no DSA type or ally has ever produced ONE bit of legislation to help people, let's watch to see what they do. They think they don't have to

"Ohhhhh this guy's a little bit too progressive and brown he's gonna be a real test for the democratic party ohhhh" and then he wins and y'all are like "Ohhh this guy's a little bit too progressive and brown he's gonna devide the democratic party ohhh" like genuinely shut your mouth

Politico: known for its gaslighting. Still at it.

Of fuck off.

We didn't want to win?

Ответ для E. Perkins 🎃

I guess not. 🤷‍♀️ They know us better than we know ourselves.

Winning against the 11 to 1 spending and this is your headline?

Pretty sure that when your opponent outspend you by about 10-1, and that you then go on to win by 2% or so that is the "big election night they wanted". What sort of horseshit reporting is going on at Politico?

Cope and seethe, Politico.

???? Who won?

Really? Progressives got a win, they beat back tens of millions of dollars, they turned out and voted. This progressive says you need to get out of your bubble because this IS the election night we wanted, a night when we beat back money with the power of our votes.

You're spinning wildly out of control

Republicans will get the big loss in November, though.

Ответ для Mel

AIPAC spent an incredible amount of money. And they lost.

This headline is insane 😂 Literally thought you were reporting that he DIDN’T win

Dear Politico, What, exactly, are you trying to accomplish? What, exactly, do you think is your job? You're a cartoon character, ffs.

Say what?

Hayley Steven’s: I want to congratulate Abdul El-Sayed on winning the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate. He is a doctor, a community health official, a Rhodes Scholar, and a dedicated Michigander. I am proud to offer my support as he takes on Mike Rogers in the general election. This Cont…

Ответ для Christine

was a thorough and rigorous campaign that brought out the full span of views within the Democratic Party - and that is why we have primaries. I am proud to have put up my hand to serve, and prouder to continue to work together to make sure this Senate seat remains blue, that we flip Cont…

Ответ для Christine

the United States Senate and continue the work for Michigan. Donald Trump and Mike Rogers want us to come out of this primary tired and divided, so their billionaire backers can come in and let multimillionaire Mike Rogers walk away with this Senate seat. They want to keep the Cont…

Ответ для Christine

the Senate red, so Mike Rogers can keep rubber-stamping Donald Trump’s harmful agenda of higher prices, manufacturing jobs lost nationwide, corruption and abuses of power, and so he can ban abortion, gut health care, and roll back workers’ rights and voting rights. I’m not going to cont….

Ответ для Christine

to let that happen. We must elect Democrats up and down the ballot. We need to flip some important House seats. We need to re-elect my friends Hillary Scholten and Kristen McDonald Rivet. We need to win this Senate seat, because Elissa Slotkin deserves a partner like Abdul in the U.S. Senate.

Corporate media always smearing the working class

HE WON. YOU ARE A FUCKING KKKLOWNSHOW AND EVERYONE KNOWS WHY POLITICO AND ITS OWNERSHIP ARE GOING TO DO EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO DENIGRATE AND FUCK THE MUSLIM PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATE. www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-ne...

www.business-humanrights.org

🤡 reporting.

“Abdul El-Sayed won— here’s why that’s bad for his campaign”

Ответ для Living well

That’s definitely a NYTimes headline…

Cry more

Politico: Progressives won, here’s how that’s actually bad for Progressives.

What a laughable take. Agenda much?

Cope and seethe, fascists

Ответ для Responsible Reposter

good old josh "was right exactly once in the most predictable election in history" ettingermentum

Did Haley Stevens write this?!

Ответ для Lord McPee
Ответ для Freya Keddie

That matters very little to me after the things she said about him during the race. Her endorsement is a given. She is still an awful person.

Ответ для Lord McPee

Infighting is so disappointing But she didn't double down on the nasty stuff That's gotta count for something Anyway, you've got an amazing, progressive candidate & I'm sure he'll win over many of her supporters

Публикация скрыта фильтром безопасности.
Ответ для Freya Keddie

What the actual fuck are you talking about? Her entire campaign was based on doubling down on attacking Abdul, instead of articulating her own positions. When an abuser brings flowers after, does that "count for something"?

Ответ для Jen Needs To Rant

Well, I hope that doesn't stop you from welcoming any of her supporters who come over to his campaign Because as more people get to know him, surely they'll realize what an amazing candidate he is, and that he's absolutely right about getting "big money" out of politics All the best

Ответ для Freya Keddie

I do hope folks will see his history and vision speak louder than ads, and I'll happily welcome new allies whenever they come around. Ty

Ответ для Jen Needs To Rant

👍

Ответ для Freya Keddie

Lol I'm not infighting. That's just a simple fact that she said racist things about him more than once. She ought be apologizing as well as endorsing him. But AI will settle for the latter.

Ответ для Lord McPee

Agree...an apology is in order He's amazing We got "big money" out of politics here in British Columbia It really does help

Right wing tabloid POLITICO

the candidate we preferred was outspent 9 times over and won, what the fuck are you talking about

When Trump won by this margin it was the Mandate of the Volk 😜

Ответ для Don Kronenberger

lol

Yes they did lmao

lol didn't they win?

(They kinda did.)

Cope harder Politico, you establishment rag

They did. They just didn't invite you to the party.

A win is a win WTF are you talking about?

Ответ для Chevron
Ответ для Polarisbetauno🇺🇦🇵🇸
Ответ для Polarisbetauno🇺🇦🇵🇸

I hope they go broke hemorrhaging money on lost elections l.

Ответ для Polarisbetauno🇺🇦🇵🇸

I heard 11 to 1

Oh fuck off with your headline. We see you.

Ответ для A Man Has No Name 🇺🇦

Same here!

They won. Now talk about Trumps margins. Hello. Hello?

You should probably cry harder, maybe piss your pants a lil too

How so?

They had a bigger election night than Oswald Cobblepot, and it only cost them a 10th the price! 🤣

So they won then.

This might be the most corncobbed thing you've ever posted.

So political bribery did ?

Cope.

Oh so he didn't win?

Are you stupid

“Establishment candidate fails to buy election, is thoroughly embarrassed.”

Seriously, that’s your header? 🤦🏻‍♀️

loser

Ответ для googamp32

A line, and a movie, that will never grow old

Ответ для Angela

What movie is that? Looks hilarious!

Ответ для Kinta I. Naomi

Monty Python and the Holy Grail. And yes, it is hilarious.

Ответ для Kinta I. Naomi

So good!

Ответ для googamp32

Politico aren't "centrists". It is a right wing supermarket rag. Criticizing centrists when right wing propagandists spread right wing propaganda is falling into their trap.

Ответ для googamp32

Bullshit

Ответ для googamp32

Lol

I thought he lost at first given the way this was written...so irresponsible. And yeah, when there are only two major parties and one isn't a cult, there will be differing opinions about a lot of things within the non-cult party. That's healthy.

by defeating Shri Thanedar and Haley Stevens? whoever wrote this likely has a college education, so youre beyond saving at this point. every resource available to you to not be stupid and this is the headline you went with. can’t fix people who are given the world and choose to be ignorant morons

Stay stupid, guys!

I didn’t know Politico was still a thing.

Ответ для Scott Melchionda

It's really not. Sometimes they just print something so ignorant that you're forced to acknowledge them for a minute.

G

Shut up. You stumpf for Trumpf.

Lmao. AIPAC burned $30M. Fuck all the way off.

Bless your little heart.

The 3 authors of this trash don't believe in journalism.

Politico sulking because they called it so wrong.

Reminding me why I don’t follow Politico…

???????? The picture of this article is of a progressive who won despite getting outspent a zillion to one. Not to mention Thanedar losing his primary to a progressive and Lawrence, a progressive, winning another primary for an open seat. Plus Tlaib easily fending off a challenger from her right.

Ответ для Jacob the Eternal Rob Refsnyder Fan

PLUS progressive leads in MI HD8 and SD2. PLUS a DSA win in the Ann Arbor mayoral primary. What an absolutely idiotic article lol

Ответ для Jacob the Eternal Rob Refsnyder Fan

It didn't take me long to get a decent vibe from McKinney, who defeated Thanedar. But then there's messes like Rage Against the Machine playing "Kick Out the Jams" in 2008.

Публикация скрыта фильтром безопасности.

Lol, she outspent him 10 to 1 and still lost. This is nothing but cope.

Hey @politico.com who's going to replace you as a news site? 🤣

Ответ для Joey Go Fast

They never were a news site. Now they are a billionaire run propaganda outlet.

Ответ для Debbie Lefkowitz

I know, just making a joke because yesterday they had a hard-on for posting stories about "Who will replace Bernie Sanders"

Ответ для Joey Go Fast

Nice riff...

Evergreen: Politico is garbage

🙄

Oh noes, is your trump/elon/pedophile/third way loving ceo having a sad now? Those millions just don't buy what they used to anymore, do they?

"Politico".

Keep moving those goalposts, guys!

🐂 💩 Stevens outspent him 10 to 1! This was a real accomplishment and politico is either unbelievably myopic or deliberately obtuse here 🤷‍♂️

Not a news organization, more a gossip column for center-right politicians, and yet readers continue to bless Politico with importance. I don't get it.

This reeks of desperation. Who won?

lol, lmao. hmbol, even. bye