Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

actually he got dragged by *leftists* & it wouldn't have been a thing except he jumped into a trans woman's mentions to say his trans friends gave him a pass to play it bc trans women aren't a monolith, so neener neener #themoreyouknow

Обсуждение

Ответы

It was a total self-goal. All he had to do was not hit Reply. Twice.

Ответ для Pete 🦆

Or just be like, "we all draw our own lines with ethical consumption." We can't really do a great refusal. We're all engaging with evil companies all the time.

This person is literally saying it's fine to sacrifice this fraction of people for vague reasons. If your thesis is it's acceptable to unhuman certain people you kinda need to have thought about those implications

Really cant wait for when the dems lose a close race in a state they never win ans trans people get blamed for it

also and yes if you pay nyt- even if its for the dumb puzzles- you are literally funding their anti-trans propoganda. that is what support is guy in screenshot.

Ответ для Rose (\(ㅇㅅㅇ❀)/)

And also guy who prolly wont see this: you cant be annoying. you can only be annoyed. same paradigm as any emotion right. people dont make me happy or sad- I am either happy or sad.

If you play an nyt game at home in secret for free eith adblock does that not *cost* the NYT money? If I cause an unethical buisness to lose money isnt that good?

I bet if that asshole was in that 0.5%, he wouldn't be so willing to throw them under the bus

I'm MOSTLY a PC user, I glance at my phone while at work but it's just a toy in my head. That being said I believe Ken Jennings is the only person I've ever unfollowed while at a bus stop. To hell with him!

Eh. Well, he's blocked now, so fuck him

yeah from what i could tell, that was his own self induced streisand effect

Ответ для ✨queer commie terrorist✨

if he hadn't made a shitty arrogant reply *and doubled down on it* there's no problem same as it ever was

Ответ для ✨queer commie terrorist✨

Games with your wife excused by a personal friend? Fine. You don't have to go around telling the whole world you're playing or try to publically claim a pass from your one friend. Like... not engaging is an absolute choice!

Ответ для ✨queer commie terrorist✨

It 100% was. It would've been a non-issue if he hadn't been a dick about it

The problem wasn't even really that he was playing the games, it was him saying "You're not allowed to get mad at me"

Ответ для Catsculptor

also the "you made me be mean bc you called me out"

Lol "people become hateful because you're annoying" it's wild when people quote the Matt Bors comic earnestly

anyway this is the problem with the liberal "trans ally" the minute an affected person says "hey, this materially harms me" they're told I'M ONE OF THE GOOD ONES HOW DARE YOU! then their friends pile on with "can you believe how mean those ungrateful transes were to poor Ken!" it sucks

Ответ для Catbus

You can just play NYT Games, accept that you’re supporting a bad company on a very small but real level, and not feel the need to demand approval for your choices. It’s really very easy! There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, so make the choices you’re going to make and be chill.

dude your celebrity fav made a shitty post, it's not the end of the world unless you make it the end of the world

Being willing to sacrifice an out group for your little word treats is *exactly* what fascists need from libs to stay in power. Fucking sad little dweebs.